The Technology Trap

What if real freedom isn’t in what technology can do, but in what you refuse to let it do for you?

These days we’re on a late vacation by the sea. I’m sitting on the beach with my son. Sun on our backs, waves in our ears. Perfect conditions for a digital detox. At least in theory. It’s early days so we both struggle.

I work in a digital field and I love technology. I believe in what it can unlock. But being a father makes me look at it differently, too. I can’t just see the possibilities. I see the trade-offs, especially for kids who are growing up with screens as their default. It’s why even leaders in Silicon Valley, from Bill Gates to Steve Jobs, famously set strict screen-time limits at home. Passion for technology and caution about its impact don’t contradict each other. They belong together.

For my son, as a digital native, being connected feels like oxygen. For me, it’s adoption, habits stacked onto a life that once ran just fine without constant pings. I’d like to say I win, that I drop my phone, dive into the water, and never look back. But the truth is mixed. Sometimes I pull him into the waves or onto a bike ride, away from the glow of a screen. Other times he drifts back, and I catch myself checking my inbox “just in case.” We both slip, we both reset. And the irony is hard to miss: if we can’t disconnect under a blue sky with the sea at our feet, when will we?

Funny thing is, technology keeps promising freedom but delivering dependency. Cars promised mobility, but gave us also traffic and smog. Smartphones promised flexibility, but they came with endless notifications. Productivity tools promised efficiency, but gave us dashboards nobody reads. Finally, AI promises easier decisions, but risks leaving us unable to question the answers we’re handed.

The pattern repeats. Tools don’t just add options, they reset expectations. If you can reply instantly, people expect it. If you can be always reachable, you should be. If you can crank out more, “more” becomes the baseline. Gains get swallowed by demands.

And it’s not just social. It’s biological. Manfred Spitzer⁽¹⁾ argues that outsourcing memory to devices doesn’t just change habits, it weakens the brain. Like skipping exercise, your mental muscles shrink. Rely on GPS every day, and your spatial sense dulls. Store every number in your phone, and you stop remembering them. Google everything, and your brain stops holding on. Tools meant to make us smarter often make us lazier.

Barry Schwartz⁽²⁾ saw the same trap in choice: more options don’t make us freer, they make us miserable. More options mean more pressure to choose right, more regret when the outcome isn’t perfect, more second-guessing. Think streaming: a hundred shows at your fingertips, but you spend half an hour scrolling and watch nothing. Or productivity apps: there’s one for every taste, but you waste more time switching between them than actually doing the work. Freedom becomes paralysis. More becomes less.

Researchers like Sherry Turkle⁽³⁾ and Nicholas Carr⁽⁴⁾ warned us years ago: technology doesn’t just change what we do, it changes who we become. More connection, more choice, more capacity, yet somehow, less freedom.

So what do we do? Not smash our phones. Not run away to cabins. But practice setting limits. Turn off most notifications: urgency is manufactured. Pick which channels deserve quick replies and let everything else wait. Avoid tools that multiply reports without changing decisions. And yes, experiment with digital detox. Some, like Cal Newport⁽⁵⁾ see it as essential to reclaim attention. Arianna Huffington champions tech-free rituals for sleep and recovery. Others, like Sherry Turkle remind us that short breaks won’t solve deeper cultural patterns, but even temporary resets can help retrain reflexes. May be detox isn’t magic. But it’s one way to practice refusal, a small reminder that, like with any addiction, control starts with saying no once.

I keep practicing with my son. Some days I win, some days I don’t. But I keep trying. Because technology isn’t going away, and I don’t want it to. I just want to make sure we’re using it, not the other way around⁽⁶⁾.

---

Further Reading